Paid and free alternatives to Red Hat Enterprise Linux

When it comes to enterprise-level Linux distributions, Red Hat has been the industry leader for many years. However, with the rise of open source software and community-driven development, there are now a variety of free and paid alternatives to Red Hat that are worth considering. In this blog post, we’ll explore some of the best options and the pros and cons of choosing either a free or paid solution.

Free alternatives to Red Hat

CentOS

CentOS is a free, community-driven Linux distribution that is based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. It provides users with a stable and predictable platform, and it’s widely used in web hosting environments. The advantage of CentOS is that it’s completely free, and it’s relatively easy to use if you’re familiar with Red Hat. However, CentOS has seen some changes since it was acquired by Red Hat in 2014, and many users have complained about the slow release schedule and lack of support.

Debian

Debian is a popular, community-driven Linux distribution that’s known for its stability and security. It’s also one of the oldest distributions, with a large and active community of developers and users. Debian is completely free, and it provides users with a vast collection of software packages that can be easily installed using its package manager. However, Debian is not as user-friendly as some of the other distributions on this list, and it may not be the best choice for beginners.

Ubuntu

Ubuntu is a widely used Linux distribution that’s known for its ease of use and robust community support. It’s based on Debian and it provides users with a variety of desktop environments to choose from. Ubuntu is free, and it’s backed by Canonical, a company that provides commercial support for enterprise customers. The advantage of Ubuntu is that it’s user-friendly and easy to set up, and it’s well-supported by the community. However, the free version of Ubuntu doesn’t come with commercial support, and users may need to purchase support from Canonical for enterprise use.

Paid alternatives to Red Hat

SUSE Linux Enterprise Server

SUSE Linux Enterprise Server (SLES) is a popular Linux distribution that’s known for its stability and reliability. It’s used by many enterprise customers, and it provides users with a variety of tools and features that are designed for business use. SLES is a paid distribution, and it’s backed by SUSE, a company that provides commercial support and services. The advantage of SLES is that it’s stable and reliable, and it comes with enterprise-level support. However, SLES can be expensive, and it may not be the best choice for small businesses or individual users.

Oracle Linux

Oracle Linux is a Linux distribution that’s based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux. It’s designed for enterprise use, and it provides users with a variety of features and tools that are optimized for business use. Oracle Linux is a paid distribution, and it’s backed by Oracle, a company that provides commercial support and services. The advantage of Oracle Linux is that it’s optimized for Oracle software, and it comes with enterprise-level support. However, Oracle Linux can be expensive, and it may not be the best choice for small businesses or individual users.

CentOS Stream

CentOS Stream is a new version of CentOS that’s designed for developers and users who want to stay on the cutting edge of technology. It’s based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux, and it provides users with access to the latest packages and updates. CentOS Stream is free, but it’s backed by Red Hat, which provides commercial support for enterprise customers. The advantage of CentOS Stream is that it’s free, and it provides users with access to the latest packages and updates. However, CentOS Stream may not be as stable as some of the other distributions on this list.

Compatibility

Compatibility is an important consideration when choosing a Linux distribution, especially in enterprise environments where compatibility with hardware, software, and other systems is crucial. Red Hat Enterprise Linux has been the industry leader in enterprise-level compatibility for many years, and many vendors and hardware manufacturers design their products to be compatible with Red Hat.

Free alternatives to Red Hat, such as CentOS, Debian, and Ubuntu, are generally compatible with a wide range of hardware and software, but they may not have the same level of compatibility testing as Red Hat. This means that there may be instances where certain hardware or software doesn’t work as expected on these distributions.

Paid alternatives to Red Hat, such as SUSE Linux Enterprise Server and Oracle Linux, are generally designed to be highly compatible with a wide range of hardware and software. These distributions often undergo rigorous compatibility testing and certification processes to ensure that they work well with other systems.

It’s important to note that compatibility can also depend on the specific use case and requirements of the organization. For example, if an organization uses a lot of Oracle software, Oracle Linux may be the best choice due to its optimized compatibility with Oracle products. However, if an organization is primarily focused on web hosting, CentOS or Ubuntu may be a better fit due to their widespread compatibility with web hosting software.

Compatibility is an important consideration when choosing a Linux distribution, and both free and paid alternatives to Red Hat can provide varying levels of compatibility with hardware, software, and other systems. It’s important to carefully evaluate the compatibility requirements of your organization and choose a distribution that best meets those needs.

Cost vs Risk

There can be cost advantages to choosing a Red Hat alternative. Red Hat Enterprise Linux is a commercial distribution that requires a paid subscription for access to updates, security patches, and technical support. While Red Hat does provide a free developer subscription, it’s limited in terms of use cases and support.

Free alternatives to Red Hat, such as CentOS and Debian, are completely free and don’t require any paid subscriptions. This can be a cost advantage for organizations that are on a tight budget and can’t afford the subscription costs of Red Hat. Ubuntu is also free, but its commercial support requires a paid subscription.

However, it’s important to consider the potential risks and hidden costs of choosing a free alternative to Red Hat. Free distributions may not have the same level of support, testing, and security as Red Hat or other paid alternatives. This means that organizations may have to invest more time and resources into managing and maintaining their systems, which can ultimately result in higher costs in the long run.

Additionally, free distributions may not have the same level of enterprise-level features and tools as Red Hat or other paid alternatives. This can limit the capabilities of an organization’s systems and may require additional investments in other tools and software.

Ultimately, the decision to choose a Red Hat alternative should be based on the specific needs and requirements of the organization, as well as its budget and resources. While there can be cost advantages to choosing a free alternative, it’s important to carefully evaluate the potential risks and hidden costs before making a decision. Paid alternatives may provide more comprehensive support, testing, and features, which can ultimately result in lower costs and greater efficiency in the long run.

If you find our articles useful, register for our monthly newsletter for regular industry insights 👇